Drawdown

Waterford, CT

NE Edge – Waterford (Millstone)

NE Edge LLC · Status uncertain

Proposed 300 MW / 1.5M sq ft campus co-located with Millstone Nuclear Power Station. Host fee agreement signed March 2023 ($231M over 30 years) required building permits by March 2026. CT Siting Council denied a key petition in Jan 2024 amid community and legislative opposition. The March 2026 permit deadline has passed with no confirmed permit as of this writing — status uncertain, not confirmed cancelled.

Estimated water use

Estimate

213,000555,000 gal/day

300 MW × 7101850 gal/day/MW (closed_loop_chilled_water)

300 MW capacity: ctexaminer.comclosed_loop_chilled_water cooling: ne-edgedatacenters.com

Ratio source: Uptime Institute Journal

Low end derived from an indirect-evaporative (ExCool-style) system reported at ~260,000 gal/year for a 1 MW facility. High end derived from a direct-evaporative system reported to use 10% of a traditional chiller/cooling-tower system's water. Both figures are this site's own gal/day/MW conversion from the cited source, not quoted verbatim.

Derived from a published industry ratio; actual use varies with operating conditions, load, and weather.

Lifecycle timeline

Observed

Confirmed events only, each with its source.

  1. February 24, 2023

    Operator discloses closed-loop air conditioning system

    NE Edge states the facility will use a closed-loop air conditioning system intended to reduce water consumption compared to drawing external cooling water. No specific water-use figures were published.

    Source
  2. January 19, 2024

    Petition denied

    CT Siting Council denied a petition by Dominion Energy Nuclear Connecticut arguing the NE Edge switchyard/project was unrelated to Millstone's generating operations and therefore exempt from Council jurisdiction — meaning the project remains subject to full Siting Council review.

    Source
  3. April 16, 2025

    Board of Selectmen allows host-fee assignment to subsidiary

    Waterford Board of Selectmen voted 2-1 to allow NE Edge LLC to assign its host-fee agreement to a subsidiary company, in an apparent effort to keep the project active ahead of the March 2026 building-permit deadline.

    Source
  4. April 15, 2026

    Local opposition activity

    An opinion piece by Concerned Citizens of Waterford and East Lyme states the host-fee agreement between NE Edge-Waterford LLC and the Town of Waterford "has ended due to a default." This is an advocacy-group opinion piece, not a government filing or town record — reported here as a claim, not a confirmed fact. Independent confirmation (e.g. a town record or Siting Council filing) has not been located.

    Source

Observed hydrologic data

Observed

From nearby USGS and NOAA monitoring stations, refreshed monthly. Dashed lines mark lifecycle milestones.

Groundwater level (ft below surface)

7 stations, overlaid

Streamflow (cubic ft/sec)

USGS Bride Brook near East Lyme, CT (0112779610) · monthly average

Precipitation (in)

NOAA Central Waterford 2.7 SSW, CT (GHCND:US1CTNL0022) · monthly average

Regulatory records

Observed

Water permits and environmental compliance records from CT DEEP Water Diversion Program and EPA ECHO.

No permit or compliance record from these sources currently matches this facility.

Other water permits in Waterford: local context only

15 other diversion permits on file in Waterford, held by other water users nearby (public water systems, industry, golf courses). The largest:

  • Dominion Energy Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.1293 MGD max
  • Dominion Energy Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.824.643 MGD max
  • Dominion Energy Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.656.6 MGD max
  • City of New London12 MGD max
  • City of New London5.5 MGD max

Drawdown story

Assessment

Is the water table's behavior near this facility consistent with its estimated draw — and how strong is the evidence? A fixed rubric, recomputed monthly; every number below is stored with the inputs that produced it. Method: attribution-v1.

  1. 1 · Pathway

    The operator has not disclosed where this facility's water comes from. Until a source is published, the assessment is capped: an unclassified pathway can never raise the score.

  2. 2 · Detectability

    Even at the high end of the estimate, the draw would be invisible (under 0.2 ft) at the nearest monitored well 1.8 mi away — "not detectable" is the expected outcome.

  3. 3 · Signal

    Monthly median depth to water: wells within 2 mi of the facility (violet) vs. matched background wells 5–15 mi away (gray). Shading marks the assessment's baseline and post-anchor windows.

    Dashed: each near well's own trend, deseasonalized and projected forward from its last reading — a projection of measured history, not a prediction, and never part of the evidence score below. Method: forecast mode.

Facility not yet operating; baseline being recorded.

Attribution evidence score: withheld · as of 2026-07-22 · attribution-v1

Pathway0/35
Detectability0/15
Temporal signal0/30
Robustness0/20